top of page
Search

Digital Immortality: Grief Tech, AI Afterlives, and the Rise of the Synthetic Soul

  • Apr 2
  • 13 min read
A woman on a couch uses her phone to see a hologram of an elderly woman in a cozy living room. Cityscape visible through the window.
Image Source: AI-generated via Gemini

In this solo episode of Signal Shift, Raakhee concludes her two-part exploration of the intersection between spirituality and artificial intelligence, focusing on the burgeoning "Grief Tech" industry and the emergence of AI in sacred music.


What happens to the sanctity of the soul when a machine can mimic our grief and our grace? We explore Grief Tech—the tools allowing us to sit down for coffee with digital twins of our deceased loved ones—and the legal "quandary" of licensing your likeness for posthumous use. We also analyze the success of Solomon Ray, the AI musician topping Christian charts, and ask: can a song be sacred without a human story behind it?




Grief Tech and Digital Immortality

As AI advances, the traditionally religious domain of the afterlife is shifting into the tech domain through Digital Twins—AI replicas of deceased individuals.

  • Interactive Avatars (Grief Bots): Unlike static recordings, "death bots" are trained on a person's data—diaries, emails, and voice recordings—to respond to loved ones in real-time with the deceased's specific mental models and perspectives.

  • Companies are encouraging people to build their digital twins while still alive—a slogan "Build Once, Live Twice" coined by afterlife.ai. This involves answering deep personal questions and uploading a visual likeness to create a posthumous simulation.

  • Ethical and Psychological Risks:

    • Licensing Your Soul: Creating a twin involves granting companies licensing rights over your digital likeness after death, raising concerns about data ownership and what happens if the company is sold.

    • Delayed Healing: Raakhee warns that a digital twin could create a toxic dependency, hindering the natural healing process and the human need for closure.

    • Secondary Loss: If the AI service is discontinued, families may essentially experience the loss of their loved one a second time.



AI in Worship: The Case of Solomon Ray

A significant cultural shift occurred in late 2025 when an AI-generated musician, Solomon Ray, topped the Christian music charts.

  • Chart Success: His debut EP, Faithful Soul, hit number one on the iTunes Christian and Gospel charts during the week of November 17, 2025.

  • The Authenticity Crisis: Solomon Ray has no physical body or personal history, yet his music is described as deeply "soulful". This raises a major theological question: Can a song be "sacred" if the singer has no human testimony or lived struggle?

  • A Return to Live Performance: Raakhee suggests that the rise of AI artists may actually drive a re-emergence of local, live music, as audiences crave the one thing AI cannot replicate: the authentic, physical presence of a human sharing their truth.


*Disclaimer: The text in this post is AI-generated from an original video podcast - applicable data sources, references and/or the episode transcript are provided below.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Selected Links:



Episode Transcript:

Horizon Shift Lab (00:00)

Hello and welcome back to Signal Shift with me, Raakhee I have a bit of a cold that I'm recovering from, so please do bear with me today. in today's episode,


I wanted to cover kind of part two of a discussion we had already started. So a few weeks back, I spoke about religion and AI and the concept of robo-clergy, really the emergence of now this robo-clergy. And that was part one. And I wanted to continue this discussion where spirituality and religion or domains that fall in there and that link with AI.


So what we explored in that episode, right, in one aspect of spirituality is how we practice religion today.


But another topic that I wanted to touch on today is this concept of digital immortality or the kind of AI afterlife, right? Which really looks at how AI is very truly, very dramatically changing our relationship with the end of life with death. Traditionally, this was the domain of religion, right? And of faith. And that's where you would go for support and guidance and a solution for what's next.


But now there's a whole other sphere that's opened up, which is sort of this digital afterlife, which doesn't sit in the faith domain anymore, right? It's the tech domain. So, you know, what happens if death is no longer the end of the conversation? That's literally what's happening right? I mean, imagine sitting down for coffee with a digital twin of your deceased grandfather, right? And, you know, this is AI that won't just like play recordings. It's not about capturing their memories as we've done in different forms throughout history.


This is different, right? It literally could react to your day in very real time even. So being able to actually call your grandfather in AI form, right? When something big happens in your life, indicate his perspective and his advice, you know, because this AI is probably trained on his thoughts, on his mental models, on any work he's done, on his diary for goodness sake, it's exactly what you'd put in there. So his thoughts, his ideas of the world, any teachings, right? All of that would be in there. So it's very much a replica of his mind. ultimately what we're seeing here is that death is sort of getting an AI upgrade.


And it seems to be a viable, possibly booming digital afterlife industry. It's known as grief tech, right? And it's all the technology and tools to support people that process and that period and that grief,


You know, so previously we've been spoke about things like estate planning, or if you know you in transition, you know, before your death, you can really use great AI planning tools, right, to help with that. And then of course, these sort of AI simulations, I think, maybe becoming more normalized but it is a industry that's growing. signal number one is around digital twins and the kind of disruption of this creating process, right? So let's dig into that a little bit. So they typically called grief bots or death bots, and they're AI generated voice and video avatars, right?


They can even be text based. I think there's a company that's simply just doing chats, right? Which maybe is an easier, more familiar, less intrusive way to engage with these chatbots. But they are trained on the data of a deceased person and they're typically created by the bereaved, right? As part of the grieving process, this inability to let go, right? So we at the stage where it's typically somebody who's


You know, I'm departed already and you do it,


But they also serve to allow you to create a digital twin of yourself while you are still alive. So it's a lot of pre-planning and thinking about this question, right? But why not create one for when you're gone to have a sort of AI digital twin, okay? You would sign up for the service, know, it would provide some questions, you would answer them, you'd give it all this data about yourself, who you are, record stories, memories, thoughts in your own voice. Like I said, in your diary, right


Upload a visual likeness in the form of images or video of yourself or any other data that's extremely personal, right? And it creates this digital replica based on that sort of training data. And then when you die, you know, this company is notified and your loved ones will be able to interact with your digital twin once you are gone. Now, I mean, I think the big scary thing about this is that you're giving this company the rights to really make this simulation of yourself, right? It's a contract, right? That's generated for posthumous use, but you give licensing rights really over yourself. Even though you're not here, they're extending your life.


And it's interesting one because this could even be a form of insurance for your family, right? So any monetary benefits that come out of them utilizing this data about you, not just for your family interactions, but maybe in other anonymized ways could lead to your family getting some money, right? There's of course the legal side, the ethical side, which very few parties are investigating, but who owns this data? What happens when they sell the company? What do they decide to do with your data? And can they simply decide in your digital twin, not your family, not anyone else, their decision?


In the case that it happens, what does it feel like for your family? What does it feel like for someone in your family to suffer this kind of loss again? So imagine that kind of scenario with the grandfather EI. And one day you can speak to his grandfather and you develop a dependence and reliance on it. A couple of days later, you can't. You know, and the person almost, you almost experienced the loss a second time around, right? So, you know, that's, there's a question there, right? You don't have any say, you have any control, you don't have any power, okay, in who is keeping this sort of AI of you alive and.


It's not a contract that you would enter lightly, I would think.


There's a lot to think about here. You can suddenly help people. It can help people grieve. But it can also, you know, make people get very dependent on it and it can hurt the natural healing process, right? Knowing that someone isn't here and we have to be okay with that, that it's a real philosophical quandary, but.


Life needs death. We need the finality of it, the completion and the closure. It needs to be done right. It's life and death, one without the other just doesn't make sense. So we've been seeing all kinds of ways that we are playing both with life, the creation of life now, right? From the cryo-freezing, cloning. I've seen things about not being able to reverse menopause and now playing with death.


It's all fascinating, but I think a reason why philosophy PhD would be so useful in this time, you know, is exactly these questions we face now is like the biggest questions of the kind of the nature. You know, even if we've dealt with these questions before, it's always been at a very metaphorical and a very theoretical level. And now these things are very, real in our lives, being able to extend our digital selves beyond death is quite something.


I think there's a lot of upsides. I think there's also a of downsides that we do not fully understand. I always use the example of social media, right? If only we knew what we know after a decade of usage and its impact on us, on young kids. It's a very similar situation here where even though it might seem beneficial and not harmful initially, it's not just about hurting the natural healing process, but what happens after the...10 years of someone interacting with your grandfather in a non-real form. And how does it impact your relationships with other real humans? Things like that, right?


So yeah, something to think about, but some of the leading companies and projects in this sphere include story file, okay, which enables sort of interactive video allowing people to talk kind of at their own funeral. So, you know, it's not fake personas, they don't sell generative ghosts, they're very clear about them, but it's a real people would answer real questions and then you would use that in sort of simulation format at something like a funeral, right? And I think that is something that people maybe are gonna be using much more often with more commonality,


Now, replica creates any sort of chat box you engage with. And you can play in replica as well and create a replica of the deceased person. There's a company called Rememory, right? And there's a couple of companies with this name, but the specific one is a service that reconstructs the life of deceased individuals. And it's run by Deep Brain AI, who have a lot of different of these kinds of applications.


Eternos is one that is really marketing to us individually, to me and you and everybody is still alive and hopefully it's a long way to go to discover, develop and protect our own individual AI. So we have to start building it right now and to own it and protect it ourselves. So should we already be thinking about it and doing it? And Afterlife AI is very similar to that. You know, and their motto is build once, live twice.


Yeah, it says it all, right? So that's one topic. The second of signal that I wanted to talk about or the second concept as well is AI worship, And this is prompted by the fact that an AI musician topped the Christian charts. Solomon Ray topped the iTunes Top 100 Christian and Gospel Albums chart during the week of November 17th to 23rd in 2025. His debut EP, Faithful Soul, which I think came out in November as well.


He's really popular singles like find your rest and goodbye temptation hit number one and two on billboards gospel digital song sales chart. So Solomon Ray is an AI generated artist, right? No physical body, no personal history. And yet his songs are described. It's very soulful. I've listened.


You know, it's beautiful music and the voice does sound very rich and deep and soulful, But it's all written, performed by AI, right? Developed by algorithms. Now, of course, there's a human producer behind that.


His profile says, okay, his Spotify profile says that he is a Mississippi-made soul singer carrying a Southern soul revival into the present.


He's had a Christmas album also with songs like A Soul for Christmas, Soul to the World and Jingle Bell. So I don't know if you guys are into gospel music or listening to it and this conversation is, you know, of course a big one, right, about artistry and AI, this big conversation everybody's having and, is it art and should AI be allowed to be competing with other singers and artists of our time, right?


But it is happening. I think about Ida, the humanoid painter, right? And I can't remember how much a painting went for the first one, it brought in a lot of money, right? Or whether it's, you know, painting to musicians, to writers, and of course, in Hollywood, all these fears around AI generating video and what's happening there. And this ongoing debate around is it okay?


Okay, or not, right? Should we prevent it? Stop it? I certainly agree with people who think... that things are moving very quickly. And, you know, we do need a pause. We need a pause so we figure these things out. And it may be a little bit too late to pause now as well. But I still think this value in pausing is we as a society have to come together to question these things. And there's some sort of discussion really within our communities and societies because this affects each and every one of us.


These should be things we are all talking about, not just simply receiving kind of top down. But either ways, question is, bigger question is, you know, it's beyond artistry, right? It goes even deeper than that because now it's saying that this is a song of worship. It's a song that's a bridge between God and the human.


And... can a song actually be sacred if the singer is not human, Or literally doesn't have testimony, Solomon Ray has not had a struggle and he's speaking to all these things, but he's speaking to all these things from a data perspective, others data, right? You know, somebody who's got that kind of second hand, it's really like somebody hearing someone else's life story and struggle in making a song and singing about it. And sure, we have that, but I'm pretty sure we'd also cancel culture around it if it wasn't their truth, right? We expect it to be somebody's own struggle, their own story.


So yeah, whether one considers that wrong or right is just that's how it's historically been, right? The pain of the artist or the singer singing their own pain. And in many faiths, it's the power of the song, the hymn comes from that artist's life in their struggle and their redemption, kind of their hero's journey.


So... whatever we may call it, it's about the pain we experience and then how we get through that and inspiring other people. And a big part of that inspiration is that there's another human behind who is going through the same thing that we connect with. So that's gone, right? Can this music really connect? But I mean, I heard the music. It sounds really good, right? Yeah, you know, I think.


There's so many ways to think about this and argue this and see this. look, there's going to be AI artistry in all these spaces. mean, it's already happening. It's not going to not happen. I don't think we exist in a world where that won't happen, right? As much as there's debates and yes, we need to pause and we need protection, but it is happening. It will happen. And this question is about who gains, right, and the wealth and who will make money from this and is that right or not and how that impacts actual artists, But I think the truth is that artistry has always never been very fair, right? you think about pop artists, okay, they are maybe good singers, maybe not the greatest, but it's a lot of marketing, it's a lot of branding, it's. You know, you look a certain way, et cetera, and a brand is created from that. But you know, somebody's really amazing is busking and singing in a train station, right? So there is that reality.


A space where AI can't replace human performance and that's live performance. And maybe there'll be the space where we can see that singer and connect and hear their personal story from them. And if anything, this maybe makes that market even bigger and cause a greater re-emergence of live music, smaller venues and more local artists. We actually get to know within our local communities. And sure, you know,


You can go online and you can get the very polished music from all kinds of artists, right? Whether it's pop artists or whether it's AI artists, you can get that kind of music there. But maybe it causes us to question, what is the value of the artist, right, or the singer, and to bring that back into our lives in a different kind of way. So...


I think it's going to have implications.


And if a digital song is still created by a human producer, he just used different tools, is that still not valid? He's still invoking emotions within you, just using different tools. But is the intent still to create goodness, whether you have the story behind it or not, whether you're the artist or not? I don't know. That's another good question, though. I think we all are going to sit in different places with this.


what we are comfortable with and where we have a lot of discomfort and what we're okay with and not. But yeah, I just wanted to finish up this conversation around religion, robo-clergy, this AI afterlife and yeah, that's, that's, in the tech space now, right? And grief tech and all these existential questions this brings up


So I think a question to take out of today's episode of the signal shift is.


If a machine can mimic our grief and our grace, what happens to the sanctity of the soul? So I will leave you with that question. I would love to know people's thoughts about this. Have you heard Solomon Ray's music? What do you think? you thinking of using any of these sort of after life, AI after life tools, these digital twins for when you're not here?


Or are you thinking of doing it for somebody who is maybe elderly in your life and may not be around soon? what are the questions that are coming up for you? Like how are you addressing that? Okay, as you grapple with these big questions, when you contemplate some of these choices. Thank you so much for being here and I will see you again next week. Bye for now.



Comments

bottom of page